Alycia Parks vs Polina Kudermetova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Recent Second Serve Performance:

In their last six months of competition, Parks has displayed a second serve success rate of 41.04%, whereas Kudermetova has triumphed in 46.33% of corresponding points. Notably, a significant correlation exists between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.

Recent Return Game Stats:

An analysis of return game statistics reveals that Parks has excelled in recent matchups, winning an impressive 53.41% of their opponent's second serve points. Comparatively, Kudermetova has showcased her prowess by securing victory in 57.63% of such points. This trend carries over to the first serve returns as well, with Parks achieving a success rate of 38.64% and Kudermetova demonstrating a slightly higher rate of 39%. These figures provide valuable insights into the favored player in this highly anticipated head-to-head clash.

Under Pressure Analysis:

When faced with challenging breakpoints, Parks has demonstrated exceptional composure and resilience, saving 56.62% of them in recent encounters. Kudermetova, on the other hand, has managed to save 55.26%. Such statistics prove instrumental in formulating in-game betting predictions.

Performance Overview:

Over the course of the past year, Parks has emerged victorious in 56.94% of their matches, boasting an impressive win/loss record of 41/31. Meanwhile, Kudermetova has attained an even higher rate of success, winning 59.77% of her matches and achieving a commendable win/loss record of 52/35. These figures provide a comprehensive overview of their head-to-head duel.

Best Surface:

Parks has exhibited excellence on hard court surfaces throughout their career, amassing a remarkable 66% winning percentage (37/19). Conversely, their performance on clay courts has been comparatively weaker, with a win rate of 45% (58/71). Comparably, Kudermetova has thrived on hard courts, having secured victory in 68% of matches (42/20). However, her performance on grass courts has proven to be less favorable, winning 50% of matches (3/3).

Player Level:

Parks has predominantly competed in Challenger/ITF tournaments valued at over $10K in the past year, triumphing in an impressive 78.13% of matches (25/7). Conversely, Kudermetova has also participated in Challenger/ITF tournaments of similar magnitude, accumulating a win percentage of 59.26% (32/22). When assessing their respective statistics, it is important to consider their performance relative to the level of the event.

Direct Head-to-Head Matches:

Parks and Kudermetova have faced each other on two occasions, with Parks emerging victorious once, while Kudermetova secured a win in the other encounter. The total number of sets played between them amounts to five, with Parks emerging triumphant in three sets and Kudermetova claiming victory in two. Their most recent encounter occurred at the Qatar TotalEnergies Open in Doha on August 2, 2025, during the qualifying rounds held on the hard court surface. Alycia Parks emerged victorious with a commanding scoreline of 6-3, 6-2.

Head-to-Head Match Duration:

When examining their head-to-head encounters, the average match duration between Parks and Kudermetova has been 1 hour, 28 minutes, and 49 seconds.

Prediction for Deciding Set:

In the event that this match extends to a deciding set, it is worth noting that Parks and Kudermetova have engaged in such scenarios once before. Yet, it is Kudermetova who emerged victorious on that occasion. This information can prove invaluable when predicting the outcome of a closely contested match.

Extreme Pressure Situations in Head-to-Head Matches:

Parks and Kudermetova have not encountered any tiebreak situations in their previous clashes. Neither player has emerged victorious in a tiebreak against the other.

Opponent Quality Stats:

Over the past 12 months, Parks has consistently faced opponents with an average ranking of 219.78, while Kudermetova's opposition possessed an average ranking of 221.37. These statistics shed light on the level of competition each player has encountered.

Performance in Deciding Sets:

For those interested in live predictions and betting, Parks has demonstrated a commendable record in deciding sets over the past 12 months, triumphing in 64% of such matches. In comparison, Kudermetova has secured victory in 48% of deciding sets across all matches played on the tour.

Current Event Head-to-Head Stats:

While analyzing past player performances is undoubtedly valuable in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to evaluate their current form within a specific event. Hence, it is advisable to refer to the section below for up-to-date statistics of players participating in the ongoing tournament (click here).

Breakpoint Conversion:

In recent competition, Parks has successfully converted 41.28% of breakpoint opportunities, while Kudermetova boasts an impressive conversion rate of 50.64%. These figures are particularly pertinent for in-game live betting tips whenever either player possesses a breakpoint opportunity.

If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article provides a comprehensive starting point. Please note that it is intended for readers with a penchant for statistical analysis.